![]() |
| Social Pyramid in Nineteenth-Century Central and South America |
![]() |
| Population Makeup of Nineteenth-Century Central and South America |
My Group's Mexican Revolution Timeline:
January 1811: Mexican rebellion lead by Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla was defeated at Calderón. He was captured and executed.
1820: Liberals took power in Spain and formed a new government that promised reforms to stop Mexican revolutions. Mexican conservatives wanted independence so they could maintain their positions and beliefs.
Early 1821: Agustín de Iturbide, the leader of the Royalist forces, negotiated the plan of Iguala with Victor Guerrero. It made Mexico an independent and constitutional monarchy.
August 24, 1822: Spanish Viceroy Juan de O'Donoju signed the treaty of Córdoba making Mexico officially a constitutional monarchy
1822: Iturbide was proclaimed the emperor of Mexico
1823: Republican leaders Santa Anna and Guadalupe Victoria deposed Iturbide and set up a republic
Like every revolution, we found two commonalities among the Mexican, Gran Colombian, and Brazilian Revolutions. All three of the revolutions that we studied took place in Central/South American lands ruled by Europeans. Spain was ruling both Mexico and Gran Colombia, and Portugal had control of Brazil. Luckily, another commonality is that all three revolutions were successful, and everyone had been granted the freedom that they sought for and deserved. At the end of each revolution, the three countries emerged with three different governments. Mexico was named a constitutional monarchy, although that was later overthrown and changed into a republic. Gran Colombia became a republic, and Brazil also became a constitutional monarchy. In each of the revolutions, someone rose to the leadership position, but they were all different people. Mexican rebels were led by Miguel Hidalgo i Iturbide, Gran Colombians were led by Bolivar, and the Brazilians followed in the footsteps of Pedro.
I am saddened to admit that race is still a problem to some people, especially people in the society I live in. Recently, most of the country has been up in arms because of the tragic killing of Michael Brown. In the small St. Louis, Missouri suburb of Ferguson, the 18-year old black man was fatally shot by a 28-year old white police officer, Darren Wilson. Brown was walking down the street with another black friend, and it is said that Wilson asked them to stop, out of suspicion and without probable cause. Brown and his friend both fled in opposite directions with hopes of avoiding the police, while Wilson continued to pursue Brown. Some witnesses say that Brown had his hands above his head like he was asked to, but others say he did not cooperate with Wilson. Nevertheless, Wilson fired twelve rounds of his handgun, seven of which struck Brown and ultimately killed him. Within the last month, the Grand Jury pronounced Officer Darren Wilson not guilty, which sent Missouri into a state of emergency, and sparked hundreds of riots throughout the country. A question still stands: Should the issue of race still be considered in our lives today? The answer is clearly yes, but I think that race should not be observed as a big difference between people, but the fact that people have issues with different races than their own definitely needs to be addressed and stopped.


No comments:
Post a Comment